My favourite AI missed a source. Dots found it.
added
I still preferred the writing from my usual AI setup. But OpenAI Dots found an official help article we'd missed while planning this video. That bothered me more than an awkward paragraph. Bad wording is easy to spot. A source that never shows up? Much harder. How do you check AI research, or do you mostly trust the answer?
Brendon Tan's first-hand research test: he preferred the writing from his usual AI setup, but his OpenAI Dot found an official help article his regular AI stack had missed while planning this very video. A concrete Dots research win — a source that never shows up is harder to catch than an awkward paragraph. First-hand, public YouTube video; author_handle is the channel name Brendon Tan (alphanumeric BrendonTan).



